Reed v. Newman

31 Misc. 792, 65 N.Y.S. 218
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Guriam.

The complaint is for wages due, and plaintiff must be confined to the period during which she actually rendered services. There can be no recovery for damages for breach [793]*793of contract under such a complaint. Fallon v. Farber, 30 Misc. Rep. 626; 62 N. Y. Supp. 742.

The judgment should, therefore, be reduced to eleven dollars and fifty cents, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegeeicii and O’Gobman,. JJ.

Judgment modified ánd as modified affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. Newman, 31 Misc. 792, 65 N.Y.S. 218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

31 Misc. 792 (Reed v. Newman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howe v. T. M. U. J. M. Fox, Inc.
124 Misc. 505 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)