Reed v. Newman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Reed v. Newman

31 Misc. 792, 65 N.Y.S. 218

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 Misc. 792 (Reed v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. Newman, 31 Misc. 792, 65 N.Y.S. 218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Guriam.

The complaint is for wages due, and plaintiff must be confined to the period during which she actually rendered services. There can be no recovery for damages for breach [793]*793of contract under such a complaint. Fallon v. Farber, 30 Misc. Rep. 626; 62 N. Y. Supp. 742.

The judgment should, therefore, be reduced to eleven dollars and fifty cents, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegeeicii and O’Gobman,. JJ.

Judgment modified ánd as modified affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI