Reed v. McEvoy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reed v. McEvoy

2 A.D.2d 738, 152 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5046

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1956

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 A.D.2d 738 (Reed v. McEvoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. McEvoy, 2 A.D.2d 738, 152 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from (1) a judgment entered in St. Lawrence County [739]*739upon a verdict of a jury rendered at a Trial Term of the Supreme Court and (2) an order denying his motion to set aside the verdict. This is an automobile negligence action in which a jury returned verdicts in favor of plaintiff wife for personal injuries and plaintiff husband for loss of services and property damage. The Trial Judge reduced the verdict in favor of plaintiff husband with his consent. Defendant claims the verdict for plaintiff wife and the reduced verdict in favor of plaintiff husband are excessive. We are unable to say that either is excessive. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Poster, P. J., Coon, Halpern, Zeller and Gibson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from (1) a judgment entered in St. Lawrence County [739]*739upon a verdict of a jury rendered at a Trial Term of the Supreme Court and (2) an order denying his motion to set aside the verdict. This is an automobile negligence action in which a jury returned verdicts in favor of plaintiff wife for personal injuries and plaintiff husband for loss of services and property damage. The Trial Judge reduced the verdict in favor of plaintiff husband with his consent. Defendant claims the verdict for plaintiff wife and the reduced verdict in favor of plaintiff husband are excessive. We are unable to say that either is excessive. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Poster, P. J., Coon, Halpern, Zeller and Gibson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 738, 152 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-mcevoy-nyappdiv-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack