Reed v. Martinez
253 F. App'x 620
Opinion
William Reed appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Because the district court correctly concluded Reed did not establish that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reed v. Martinez, 253 F. App'x 620 (8th Cir. 2007).
253 F. App'x 620 (Reed v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241
Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence
28 U.S.C. § 2255