Reed v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Reed v. Martin

5 Ky. Op. 564, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 510

DecidedDecember 14, 1871

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ky. Op. 564 (Reed v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. Martin, 5 Ky. Op. 564, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 510 (Ky. Ct. App. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The three instructions given upon the trial of this action correctly expounded the law of this case, and there is certainly proof in the record conducing to establish the state of facts upon which the two instructions given at the instance of appellee were hypothicated.

The finding of the jury is not palpably wrong, and a reversal cannot be had upon the sole ground that the evidence preponderates against the verdict upon which appellees judgment is founded.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The three instructions given upon the trial of this action correctly expounded the law of this case, and there is certainly proof in the record conducing to establish the state of facts upon which the two instructions given at the instance of appellee were hypothicated.

The finding of the jury is not palpably wrong, and a reversal cannot be had upon the sole ground that the evidence preponderates against the verdict upon which appellees judgment is founded.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Ky. Op. 564, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-martin-kyctapp-1871.