Reed v. Marble
3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 90, 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 332
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reed v. Marble. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Paige Ch. 409 →
Opinion
Decided that the assignee of a bond and mortgage, as well as assignees of other choses in action, must give notice of the assignment if he wishes to protect himself against a bona fide payment to the assignor, by the mortgagor* And that even the recording of an assignment of a mortgage is only constructive notice to subsequent purchasers or assignees of or from the mortgagor or original assignor.
Order appealed from affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reed v. Marble, 3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 90, 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 332 (N.Y. 1843).
3 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 90 (Reed v. Marble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.