Reed v. Lowe's Home Centers Inc.
This text of 86 F. App'x 734 (Reed v. Lowe's Home Centers Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff-appellant Michelle Reed (Reed) appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her claims against Defendant-appellee, Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., alleging employment discrimination and also claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress under Texas state law. Our de novo review of the record leads to the inescapable conclusion that Reed failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination and that her proof and allegations with respect to her state law tort claim cannot survive summary judgment. The judgment of the district court is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s order dated July 16, 2003.
AFFIRMED
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 F. App'x 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-lowes-home-centers-inc-ca5-2004.