REED v. LONG
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER REED, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-CV-385 (MTT) ) GARY LONG, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) __________________ )
ORDER On October 27, 2020, the Court entered an order denying the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granting in part and denying in part the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The only remaining claim was Plaintiff Holden’s takings claim against the Sheriff in his official capacity. The Defendants’ motion had addressed Eleventh Amendment immunity but did not specifically address whether that immunity applied to takings claims. Doc. 51-4 at 6-7, 29. In response, the Plaintiffs argued, based on inapposite, Georgia law, that the Eleventh Amendment did not apply to the takings claims. Doc. 56 at 19. The Court denied the Defendants’ motion as to the official-capacity takings claims. Doc. 58 at 8. The Defendants then moved for reconsideration, specifically arguing that the Eleventh Amendment bars the takings claims. Docs. 59; 59-1 at 1-3.1 The Plaintiffs did
1 The Defendants note that they summarily argued this point in their reply brief. Doc. 59-1 at 2 n.1 (citing Doc. 57 at 10 n.4). Plaintiff’s counsel had proposed a schedule under which both parties would have extra time to file response briefs but would waive reply briefs. The Court was under the impression the parties had adopted that schedule and did not consider the Defendants’ reply. The Plaintiffs did not file a reply. not respond. After review, the Court finds the Eleventh Amendment bars the takings claims. See Harbert Int'l, Inc. v. James, 157 F.3d 1271, 1277 (11th Cir. 1998) (“[W]e conclude that Harbert's Fifth Amendment Takings Clause claim is barred by Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity.”). Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration (Doc.
59) is GRANTED, the prior order (Doc. 58) is VACATED, and the Court will enter an amended order. SO ORDERED, this 10th day of December, 2020. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
REED v. LONG (REED v. LONG) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.