Reed v. Kostynick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reed v. Kostynick

8 A.D.2d 620, 185 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9331

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 6, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 620 (Reed v. Kostynick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. Kostynick, 8 A.D.2d 620, 185 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds (1) that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 4), and (2) that the contract on which the cause of action is founded is unenforcible under the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 31 of the Personal Property Law (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 107, subd. 7). Order affirmed, with $10 caste and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallman and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds (1) that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 4), and (2) that the contract on which the cause of action is founded is unenforcible under the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 31 of the Personal Property Law (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 107, subd. 7). Order affirmed, with $10 caste and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallman and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 620, 185 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-kostynick-nyappdiv-1959.