Reed v. Joe Sperino Plymouth, Inc.

286 N.E.2d 350, 7 Ill. App. 3d 57, 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2206
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedAugust 8, 1972
DocketNo. 71-161
StatusPublished

This text of 286 N.E.2d 350 (Reed v. Joe Sperino Plymouth, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. Joe Sperino Plymouth, Inc., 286 N.E.2d 350, 7 Ill. App. 3d 57, 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2206 (Ill. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GEORGE J. MORAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of St. Clair County vacating a default judgment against the defendant.

Plaintiffs filed a suit against defendant on June 8, 1970. Defendant was served with summons on June 12, 1970. On July 23, 1970, the plaintiff obtained a default order and a default judgment against defendant in the amount of $5,705.60. The record reflects that no notice of plaintiff’s intention to secure a default order and judgment was given to the defendant and no evidence was heard prior to the court’s entry of the judgment. On October 2, 1970, defendant was served with a citation to discover assets at which time he immediately contacted his attorney. Defendant claims, and there is no denial, that this was his first notice of the entry of the order of default and the judgment against him.

Defendant thereafter, on October 21, 1970, filed a petition to set aside judgment pursuant to Section 72 of the Civil Practice Act. On April 2, 1971, defendant filed affidavits containing specific facts to support the allegations of his petition. Three days thereafter plaintiff filed a counter-affidavit, and on April 7, 1971, the trial judge entered an order setting aside the default judgment and allowing a verified answer to be filed. It is from this order that plaintiff appeals.

We affirm. Elfman v. Evanston Bus Co., 27 Ill.2d 609; Widicus v. Southwestern Elec. Cooperative, 26 Ill.App.2d 102 and Sentry Royalty v. Craft, 79 Ill.App.2d 410.

Order affirmed.

EBERSPACHER and CREBS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sentry Royalty Co. v. Craft
226 N.E.2d 282 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1967)
Elfman v. Evanston Bus Co.
190 N.E.2d 348 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1963)
Widicus v. Southwestern Electric Cooperative, Inc.
167 N.E.2d 799 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 N.E.2d 350, 7 Ill. App. 3d 57, 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-joe-sperino-plymouth-inc-illappct-1972.