Reed v. Herring

Texas Supreme Court

Reed v. Herring

37 Tex. 160

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1873

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 Tex. 160 (Reed v. Herring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. Herring, 37 Tex. 160 (Tex. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Walker, J.

The evidence in this case is conflicting. Proof of the declarations of Wilborn should not have been admitted, unless they were made before the assignment of the claim to Herring on which the suit is brought.

The appellee makes a remittitur in this court, which should have been made before the case was appealed. This having been omitted, the appellee must pay the costs incurred by the appeal, and the judgment of .the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker, J.

The evidence in this case is conflicting. Proof of the declarations of Wilborn should not have been admitted, unless they were made before the assignment of the claim to Herring on which the suit is brought.

The appellee makes a remittitur in this court, which should have been made before the case was appealed. This having been omitted, the appellee must pay the costs incurred by the appeal, and the judgment of .the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Tex. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-herring-tex-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack