Reed v. Giles
This text of 974 So. 2d 624 (Reed v. Giles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
La Glenda REED, Appellant,
v.
Archie GILES, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
La Glenda Reed, Blythe, California, pro se.
*625 No brief filed for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
La Glenda Reed, the appellant, seeks review of a trial court order denying her motion to dissolve a permanent injunction against domestic violence. Courts have broad discretion regarding injunctions. Miguez v. Miguez, 824 So.2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (citing Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So.2d 336, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)). Reed has failed to demonstrate that there was an abuse of discretion. Miguez, 824 So.2d at 258 (citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979)). We therefore affirm.
Affirmed.
KLEIN, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
974 So. 2d 624, 2008 WL 508603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-giles-fladistctapp-2008.