Reed v. Gage

Michigan Supreme Court

Reed v. Gage

33 Mich. 179, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 17

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 7, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 33 Mich. 179 (Reed v. Gage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. Gage, 33 Mich. 179, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 17 (Mich. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

1. The identity of the plaintiff with the plaintiff in the-suit against Cole was properly and sufficiently proved; and the judgment record in the Cole suit was therefore correctly [181]*181admitted in evidence so far as any objection growing out of the variance in name was concerned.

2. The justice’s judgment could not be attacked collaterally upon the ground of failure to make proof, as required by the statute (Comp. L. 1871, § 5305), of the authority of the plaintiff’s attorney.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

1. The identity of the plaintiff with the plaintiff in the-suit against Cole was properly and sufficiently proved; and the judgment record in the Cole suit was therefore correctly [181]*181admitted in evidence so far as any objection growing out of the variance in name was concerned.

2. The justice’s judgment could not be attacked collaterally upon the ground of failure to make proof, as required by the statute (Comp. L. 1871, § 5305), of the authority of the plaintiff’s attorney.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Mich. 179, 1876 Mich. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-gage-mich-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack