Reed v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida

Reed v. Florida Industrial Commission

206 So. 2d 386

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 31, 1968

DocketNo. 36626

StatusPublished

This text of 206 So. 2d 386 (Reed v. Florida Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reed v. Florida Industrial Commission, 206 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM,

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 22, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorneys’ fees filed by Petitioner is also denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI