Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Reed v. Fischer

Reed v. Fischer

92 A.D.3d 1001, 937 N.Y.2d 640
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 A.D.3d 1001 (Reed v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. Fischer, 92 A.D.3d 1001, 937 N.Y.2d 640 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

[1002]*1002It is well settled that no appeal lies from the denial of an ex parte application for an order to show cause (see Matter of Tafari v Rock, 85 AD3d 1485 [2011], lv dismissed 17 NY3d 949 [2011]; Matter of Harris v Travis, 302 AD2d 649, 650 [2003]). Consequently, the appeal must be dismissed.

Mercure, A.P.J., Rose, Lahtinen, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Fischer
104 A.D.3d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.3d 1001, 937 N.Y.2d 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2012.