Reed v. Dougherty

20 S.E. 965, 94 Ga. 661, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 249
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 30, 1894·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

The attachment was issued against Reed, a non-resident, and was levied on land. In his declaration plaintiff alleged, that Reed was indebted to him the sum for which the attachment was issued, for the purchase-money of a number of land lots; that defendant entered into a written contract (set out in the head-note) for the purchase of said land; that plaintiff had fully complied with all the conditions of the same; and that defendant had 'utterly failed to comply therewith, or to pay the purchase money or any of it. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. Dougherty, 20 S.E. 965, 94 Ga. 661, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 249 (Ga. 1894).

20 S.E. 965 (Reed v. Dougherty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clayton v. Deverell
362 S.E.2d 364 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1987)
Burden v. Thomas
121 S.E.2d 684 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Loewus v. Eskridge & Downing Inc.
165 S.E. 576 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Pope v. Barnett
163 S.E. 517 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Maury v. Unruh
126 So. 113 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Crim v. Southern Realty & Trust Corp.
144 S.E. 342 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Colson v. Estate of Johnson
197 N.W. 674 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1924)
Jones v. Tschetter
194 N.W. 839 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1923)
Prichard v. Mulhall
103 N.W. 774 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)
Morris v. McKee
24 S.E. 142 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)