Reed v. Dollar Mart Stores, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Reed v. Dollar Mart Stores, Inc.

434 S.W.3d 117, 2014 WL 2883412, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 715

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 24, 2014·No. No. WD 76948·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Francine Reed appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s order denying her unemployment compensation benefits. She contends that there was substantial evidence as to why she did not file her appeal in a timely manner and substantial evidence that she had good cause for voluntarily leaving her employment with Dollar Mart Stores, Inc. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the Commission’s order.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Francine Reed appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s order denying her unemployment compensation benefits. She contends that there was substantial evidence as to why she did not file her appeal in a timely manner and substantial evidence that she had good cause for voluntarily leaving her employment with Dollar Mart Stores, Inc. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the Commission’s order.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Reed v. Dollar Mart Stores, Inc., 434 S.W.3d 117, 2014 WL 2883412, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 715 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

434 S.W.3d 117 (Reed v. Dollar Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.