Reed v. DeWolf

1 Wright 418, 1 Ohio Ch. 418
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1833
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 418 (Reed v. DeWolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. DeWolf, 1 Wright 418, 1 Ohio Ch. 418 (Ohio 1833).

Opinion

*BY THE COURT.

The record shows the most perfect bur- [420 lesque of judicial proceedings we have ever met with. The pro[430]*430ceeding in issuing the various writs of certiorari, if authorized by any law of any other state, are evidently without sanction in our laws or practice, and show a course of proceeding before the justice, and in the Court of Common Pleas, deserving the severest reprobation. Bui, inasmuch as the writ of error in this ease has improvidently issued, while the cause is still pending in the Common Pleas, before final judgment, the writ must be quashed, as none other than a final judgment can be reached on error.

[No writ of error until final judgment, followed; Kelly v. Hunter, 12 O. 216, 219; Longworth v. Sturges, 6 O. S. 143, 157; Schaeffer v. Marienthal, 17 O. S. 183, 188.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phipps v. Kelly
6 P. 707 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wright 418, 1 Ohio Ch. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-dewolf-ohio-1833.