Reed v. Department of Labor & Industries

30 P.2d 667, 176 Wash. 705, 1934 Wash. LEXIS 846
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reed v. Department of Labor & Industries. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 Wash. 33
Washington Supreme Court·Decided July 23, 1934·No. No. 24765. En Banc.·Published

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having been argued to a Department of the court on October 30, 1933, and the opinion of the trial court having been affirmed (ante p. 33, 27 P. (2d) 1073), and the cause having been thereafter assigned for rehearing En Banc, and having been argued to the court sitting En Banc on June 4, 1934, and the court having considered the questions presented and the opinion of the Department of this court filed in this cause above referred to, it is ordered that the words,

“and the benefit of the doubt should be given the claimant under the industrial insurance law,”

commencing in the fourth line of the last paragraph of the opinion, be and the same are hereby deleted from the opinion.

A majority of the court adheres to the Departmental opinion as so amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. Department of Labor & Industries, 30 P.2d 667, 176 Wash. 705, 1934 Wash. LEXIS 846 (Wash. 1934).

30 P.2d 667 (Reed v. Department of Labor & Industries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. Department of Labor & Industries
27 P.2d 1073 (Washington Supreme Court, 1934)