Reed v. Corbin

38 So. 942, 115 La. 137, 1905 La. LEXIS 630
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 19, 1905
DocketNo. 15,664
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 38 So. 942 (Reed v. Corbin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. Corbin, 38 So. 942, 115 La. 137, 1905 La. LEXIS 630 (La. 1905).

Opinion

PROVO STY, J.

The Court of Appeal, on defendants’ application for a rehearing, set aside the judgment it had rendered in favor of plaintiff, and rendered judgment in favor of defendants. This it was without authority to do. “If the application (for rehearing) be refused,” says Act' No. 100 of 1896, p. 150, “the judgment or decree shall become final; if granted, the case shall be continued on the docket for the next term.”

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the Court of Appeal in this case be set aside, and that this case be placed on the docket of the said court, to be proceeded with according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Presley v. Upper Mississippi Towing Corporation
141 So. 2d 411 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1962)
Jacobs v. Lagrange
119 So. 538 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1929)
Lonatro v. Palace Theatre Co.
5 La. App. 386 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1926)
Monroe Hardware Co. v. Delatte
4 La. App. 66 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1925)
Union Sawmill Co. v. Arkansas Southeastern R.
49 So. 173 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 So. 942, 115 La. 137, 1905 La. LEXIS 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-corbin-la-1905.