Reed v. Collins

5 Serg. & Rawle 351
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 19, 1819
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Serg. & Rawle 351 (Reed v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. Collins, 5 Serg. & Rawle 351 (Pa. 1819).

Opinion

By The Court.

The error in leaving a blank in the writ of error for the month in which the Court was to be held, is a clerical error which this Court may amend. The law fixes the day in July, to which the writ was returnable, and the clerk ought to have made it returnable on that day, because the prcecipe was for a writ to the July Term.

As to the error assigned by the plaintiff in error, we think it fatal. It appears on the record, that the action was commenced before the justice, before the cause of action accrued. We have decided this point before. The judgment must therefore be reversed.

The defendant’s counsel then moved for a venire de novo, which the Court refused, because no error was shewn in any thing which took place during the trial.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffith v. Eshelman
4 Watts 51 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1835)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Serg. & Rawle 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-collins-pa-1819.