Reed v. City of Greenville

83 Miss. 192
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 83 Miss. 192 (Reed v. City of Greenville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. City of Greenville, 83 Miss. 192 (Mich. 1903).

Opinion

Whitfield, O. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe contention of learned counsel for appellant is ingenious, but not sound. Tbe definition of petit larceny in tbe section quoted from tbe. ordinance of tbe city of Greenville is tbe common law definition, and carries with it all tbe common law incidents of tbe crime, among others tbe one that an accessory, in [195]*195petit larceny is a principal, and is to be punished as such. The doctrine that an accessory before the fact in misdemeanors is a principal is an inseparable incident of every definition of each offense. We look to the common law for the definition of the offense of petit larceny, and we must take with the definition of the offense all incidents the common law attaches.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Labella
232 So. 2d 354 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1970)
Hathorn v. State
149 So. 2d 845 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Smith v. State
72 So. 2d 215 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
Gulf S.I.R. Co. v. Still
152 So. 824 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 Miss. 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-city-of-greenville-miss-1903.