Reed v. City of Greenville

83 Miss. 192
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1903·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Whitfield, O. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe contention of learned counsel for appellant is ingenious, but not sound. Tbe definition of petit larceny in tbe section quoted from tbe. ordinance of tbe city of Greenville is tbe common law definition, and carries with it all tbe common law incidents of tbe crime, among others tbe one that an accessory, in [195] petit larceny is a principal, and is to be punished as such. The doctrine that an accessory before the fact in misdemeanors is a principal is an inseparable incident of every definition of each offense. We look to the common law for the definition of the offense of petit larceny, and we must take with the definition of the offense all incidents the common law attaches.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. City of Greenville, 83 Miss. 192 (Mich. 1903).

83 Miss. 192 (Reed v. City of Greenville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Labella
232 So. 2d 354 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1970)
Hathorn v. State
149 So. 2d 845 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Smith v. State
72 So. 2d 215 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
Gulf S.I.R. Co. v. Still
152 So. 824 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1934)