Reed v. Burt

78 S.E.2d 539, 89 Ga. App. 46, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 894
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 23, 1953
Docket34795
StatusPublished

This text of 78 S.E.2d 539 (Reed v. Burt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. Burt, 78 S.E.2d 539, 89 Ga. App. 46, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 894 (Ga. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Teuton, J.

Where a plaintiff was a paying passenger riding in the defendant’s taxicab, which was being operated by the plaintiff’s husband as the defendant’s driver, and the plaintiff was injured due to the driver’s negligence, the plaintiff is not precluded from recovery merely because the defendant’s driver happened to be her husband. Garnto v. Henson, 88 Ga. App. 320 (76 S. E. 2d 636). The court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Sutton, O. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garnto v. Henson
76 S.E.2d 636 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 S.E.2d 539, 89 Ga. App. 46, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-burt-gactapp-1953.