Reed v. Burt
78 S.E.2d 539, 89 Ga. App. 46, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 894
Opinion
Where a plaintiff was a paying passenger riding in the defendant’s taxicab, which was being operated by the plaintiff’s husband as the defendant’s driver, and the plaintiff was injured due to the driver’s negligence, the plaintiff is not precluded from recovery merely because the defendant’s driver happened to be her husband. Garnto v. Henson, 88 Ga. App. 320 (76 S. E. 2d 636). The court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reed v. Burt, 78 S.E.2d 539, 89 Ga. App. 46, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 894 (Ga. Ct. App. 1953).
78 S.E.2d 539 (Reed v. Burt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garnto v. Henson
76 S.E.2d 636 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)