Reed v. Burt
This text of 78 S.E.2d 539 (Reed v. Burt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a plaintiff was a paying passenger riding in the defendant’s taxicab, which was being operated by the plaintiff’s husband as the defendant’s driver, and the plaintiff was injured due to the driver’s negligence, the plaintiff is not precluded from recovery merely because the defendant’s driver happened to be her husband. Garnto v. Henson, 88 Ga. App. 320 (76 S. E. 2d 636). The court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 S.E.2d 539, 89 Ga. App. 46, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-burt-gactapp-1953.