Reed v. Burghart
This text of 240 A.D. 1014 (Reed v. Burghart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed,' with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for consolidation granted, with ten dollars costs. Memorandum. The only objection to consolidation is made by Julia Burghart. Consolidation deprives no plaintiff of the right to open and close, and the consolidated action is ordered preferred under the provisions of section 138, subdivision 20, of the Civil Practice Act. (Gibbs v. Sokol, 216 App. Div. 260.) All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-burghart-nyappdiv-1933.