Reed v. Burghart
240 A.D. 1014
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published
Opinion
Order reversed,' with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for consolidation granted, with ten dollars costs. Memorandum. The only objection to consolidation is made by Julia Burghart. Consolidation deprives no plaintiff of the right to open and close, and the consolidated action is ordered preferred under the provisions of section 138, subdivision 20, of the Civil Practice Act. (Gibbs v. Sokol, 216 App. Div. 260.) All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reed v. Burghart, 240 A.D. 1014 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 1014 (Reed v. Burghart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibbs v. Sokol
216 A.D. 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)