Reed v. Arkansas Highway Police

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided September 17, 2021·No. 4:20-cv-01431·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION TERRITHA R. REED PLAINTIFF vs. Case No. 4:20 cv 1431 JM ARKANSAS HIGHWAY POLICE DEFENDANT JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the order entered this same day, the complaint of the Plaintiff is dismissed with prejudice. ! Dated this 17th day of September, 2021.

UNITED Lat fe RICT JUDGE

(T]he Eighth Circuit has held that, under Title VII, a dismissal without prejudice operates to leave a plaintiff as if no action had been filed. /d. (citing Moore v. St. Louis Music Supply Co., Inc., 539 F.2d 1191, 1194 (8th Cir. 1976)). Thus, any dismissal of a Title VII or ADEA case that occurs, as it did here, more than 90 days after the right to sue letter issued is, in substance, a dismissal with prejudice.” Faulkner v. Townsell, No. 4:18-CV-00353 KGB, 2020 WL 2818512, at *8 (E.D. Ark. May 28, 2020).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. Arkansas Highway Police, (E.D. Ark. 2021).

Reed v. Arkansas Highway Police (Reed v. Arkansas Highway Police) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related