Reed v. Arkansas Highway Police
This text of Reed v. Arkansas Highway Police (Reed v. Arkansas Highway Police) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION TERRITHA R. REED PLAINTIFF vs. Case No. 4:20 cv 1431 JM ARKANSAS HIGHWAY POLICE DEFENDANT JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the order entered this same day, the complaint of the Plaintiff is dismissed with prejudice. ! Dated this 17th day of September, 2021.
UNITED Lat fe RICT JUDGE
(T]he Eighth Circuit has held that, under Title VII, a dismissal without prejudice operates to leave a plaintiff as if no action had been filed. /d. (citing Moore v. St. Louis Music Supply Co., Inc., 539 F.2d 1191, 1194 (8th Cir. 1976)). Thus, any dismissal of a Title VII or ADEA case that occurs, as it did here, more than 90 days after the right to sue letter issued is, in substance, a dismissal with prejudice.” Faulkner v. Townsell, No. 4:18-CV-00353 KGB, 2020 WL 2818512, at *8 (E.D. Ark. May 28, 2020).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reed v. Arkansas Highway Police, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-arkansas-highway-police-ared-2021.