Reed v. American Risk Assurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reed v. American Risk Assurance Co.

518 So. 2d 935, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 91, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11660, 1987 WL 3021

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 1987·No. No. 87-1172·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court having entered a summary judgment for an insurance carrier “determined that the proper method for determining no-fault benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 627.739(2), Florida Statutes (1985), is to apply the applicable percentage (80% for medical bills or 60% for a wage loss) to the total bills to determine the ‘benefits otherwise due’, then apply the deductible, if any.” We affirm upon the reasoning announced by the 4th District Court of Appeal in Atlas Mutual Insurance Company v. Wolfort, 506 So.2d 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); International [936]*936Bankers Insurance Company v. Govan, 502 So.2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court having entered a summary judgment for an insurance carrier “determined that the proper method for determining no-fault benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 627.739(2), Florida Statutes (1985), is to apply the applicable percentage (80% for medical bills or 60% for a wage loss) to the total bills to determine the ‘benefits otherwise due’, then apply the deductible, if any.” We affirm upon the reasoning announced by the 4th District Court of Appeal in Atlas Mutual Insurance Company v. Wolfort, 506 So.2d 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); International [936]*936Bankers Insurance Company v. Govan, 502 So.2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Reed v. American Risk Assurance Co., 518 So. 2d 935, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 91, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11660, 1987 WL 3021 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

518 So. 2d 935 (Reed v. American Risk Assurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related