Reed v. American Risk Assurance Co.

518 So. 2d 935, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 91, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11660, 1987 WL 3021
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 22, 1987
DocketNo. 87-1172
StatusPublished

This text of 518 So. 2d 935 (Reed v. American Risk Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. American Risk Assurance Co., 518 So. 2d 935, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 91, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11660, 1987 WL 3021 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court having entered a summary judgment for an insurance carrier “determined that the proper method for determining no-fault benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 627.739(2), Florida Statutes (1985), is to apply the applicable percentage (80% for medical bills or 60% for a wage loss) to the total bills to determine the ‘benefits otherwise due’, then apply the deductible, if any.” We affirm upon the reasoning announced by the 4th District Court of Appeal in Atlas Mutual Insurance Company v. Wolfort, 506 So.2d 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); International [936]*936Bankers Insurance Company v. Govan, 502 So.2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

INTERN. BANKERS INS. CO. v. Govan
502 So. 2d 913 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Atlas Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolfort
506 So. 2d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
518 So. 2d 935, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 91, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11660, 1987 WL 3021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-american-risk-assurance-co-fladistctapp-1987.