Reed-Smith v. Spartanburg County School District Seven

603 F. App'x 227
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1300
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 603 F. App'x 227 (Reed-Smith v. Spartanburg County School District Seven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed-Smith v. Spartanburg County School District Seven, 603 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn E. Reed-Smith appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. On appeal, we con-fíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Reed-Smith’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Reed-Smith has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-, tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCray v. Lieber C.I.
D. South Carolina, 2023

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
603 F. App'x 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-smith-v-spartanburg-county-school-district-seven-ca4-2015.