Reed-Smith v. Spartanburg County School District Seven

603 F. App'x 227
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 21, 2015·No. No. 15-1300·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn E. Reed-Smith appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. On appeal, we con-fíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Reed-Smith’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Reed-Smith has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-, tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed-Smith v. Spartanburg County School District Seven, 603 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2015).

603 F. App'x 227 (Reed-Smith v. Spartanburg County School District Seven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCray v. Lieber C.I.
D. South Carolina, 2023