Reed J. Bates v. State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 24, 2011
Docket11-11-00025-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Reed J. Bates v. State of Texas (Reed J. Bates v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed J. Bates v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Opinion filed March 24, 2011

                                                                       In The

  Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                   __________

                                                         No. 11-11-00025-CR

                                       REED J. BATES, Appellant

                                                             V.

                                      STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                              On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

                                                              Ellis County, Texas

                                                 Trial Court Cause No. 1010552CR

                                            M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

            The trial court convicted Reed J. Bates of the offense of reckless driving and assessed punishment at confinement for thirteen days and a fine of $100.  We dismiss the appeal.

            Appellant’s sentence was imposed on August 17, 2010.  A timely motion for new trial was filed on August 31 and was overruled by operation of law pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 21.8.  Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on November 29, 2010, 104 days after the date sentence was imposed.  Upon receiving the clerk’s record, this court notified the parties by letter dated February 14, 2011, that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that no motion for extension had been timely filed.  We requested that appellant provide proof that a notice of appeal had been timely filed, and we informed appellant that the appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Appellant has not responded to our letter. 

            Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2), a notice of appeal is due ninety days after the day sentence is imposed.  In this case, the due date was November 15, 2010.  Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.  Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.  Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

                                                                                    PER CURIAM

March 24, 2011

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodarte v. State
860 S.W.2d 108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Reed J. Bates v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-j-bates-v-state-of-texas-texapp-2011.