Reed ex rel. Polly v. McGrew
This text of 1 Wright 105 (Reed ex rel. Polly v. McGrew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The contract is not now evidence. If it is to be made-so because it is connected with, or dependent upon some other fact to be proved, that fact must be first introduced, if required by the-defendant, in order to open the door for this evidence.
The defendant then offered to read a deposition of one Henline, who had covenanted to convey the land to the defendant. It was objected to this, that the witness was interested, and might discharge his own liability.
LANE, J. For the present, the deposition may be read. The-interest of the witness, if any, is balanced between these parties, or cannot be affected by the verdict. .
Verdict for the defendant.
Motion for a new trial — reserved for Court in Bank. [See 5 Ohio, 375.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wright 105, 1 Ohio Ch. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-ex-rel-polly-v-mcgrew-ohio-1832.