Reed ex rel. Polly v. McGrew

1 Wright 105, 1 Ohio Ch. 105
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1832
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 105 (Reed ex rel. Polly v. McGrew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed ex rel. Polly v. McGrew, 1 Wright 105, 1 Ohio Ch. 105 (Ohio 1832).

Opinion

LANE, J.

The contract is not now evidence. If it is to be made-so because it is connected with, or dependent upon some other fact to be proved, that fact must be first introduced, if required by the-defendant, in order to open the door for this evidence.

The defendant then offered to read a deposition of one Henline, who had covenanted to convey the land to the defendant. It was objected to this, that the witness was interested, and might discharge his own liability.

LANE, J. For the present, the deposition may be read. The-interest of the witness, if any, is balanced between these parties, or cannot be affected by the verdict. .

Verdict for the defendant.

Motion for a new trial — reserved for Court in Bank. [See 5 Ohio, 375.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wright 105, 1 Ohio Ch. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-ex-rel-polly-v-mcgrew-ohio-1832.