Reece, Johnny Louis v. Jeffrey Darrell Moffitt, d/b/a Moffitt Logging

2016 TN WC 36
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedFebruary 16, 2016
Docket2015-01-0318
StatusPublished

This text of 2016 TN WC 36 (Reece, Johnny Louis v. Jeffrey Darrell Moffitt, d/b/a Moffitt Logging) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reece, Johnny Louis v. Jeffrey Darrell Moffitt, d/b/a Moffitt Logging, 2016 TN WC 36 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT CHATTANOOGA

Johnny Louis Reece, ) Docket No.: 2015-01-0199 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 51113-2015 ) Jeffrey Darrell Moffitt, d/b/a Moffitt ) Judge Thomas Wyatt Logging, ) Employer. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER FOR TEMPORARY DISABILITY AND MEDICAL BENEFITS

THIS CAUSE came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge on January 20, 2016, upon the Request for Expedited Hearing (REH) filed by the employee, Christopher Johnny Louis Reece, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6- 239 (2015). Mr. Reece seeks temporary disability and medical benefits from Jeffrey Moffitt, d/b/a Moffitt Logging (Moffitt)! the uninsured and unrepresented employer, arising from a work-related injury to his head, neck, left hip and left knee occurring October 24, 2014. (T.R. 1 at 1.)

The central legal issue raised during this Expedited Hearing is whether, and to what extent, Mr. Reece is entitled to temporary disability and medical benefits. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds Mr. Reece is entitled to temporary disability and medical benefits.

History of Claim

Mr. Reece is a fifty-four-year-old resident of Pikeville, Bledsoe County, Tennessee. (T.R. 1 at 1.) On the date of injury he had worked approximately a year and a half as a logger for Moffitt. (Ex. 1 at 1-2.) Mr. Reece, who cannot read and can only write his name, testified that, at age thirteen, he quit the fourth or fifth grade to work on a farm. /d. at 4. He testified he worked "off and on" for most of his working life as a 1 Wherever referenced in this Order, the term "Moffitt" refers to both Mr. Moffitt individually and to the business known as Moffitt Logging.

1 logger.

Mr. Reece testified Moffitt paid him $925 per week for logging and night watchman duties. (Ex. 1 at 2.) Mr. Reece testified Mr. Moffitt paid him with a check, did not withhold taxes, and did not give him a W-2 form for wages paid in 2013. Id. at 3. He also testified he worked under Moffitt employee Rayburn Prater who, as foreman, directed him when and where to work; which trees to cut down; and provided him all tools and equipment needed to perform the directed duties. Id.

On October 28, 2014, Mr. Reece sustained injuries to his neck, middle back, ribs, left hip, left femur and left knee when the top of a tree struck him and crushed him beneath its weight. (Ex. 1 at 2.) The records of the Erlanger Medical Center emergency department indicated Mr. Reece arrived by Life Force air ambulance on October 28, 2014. (Ex. 6 at 1.) Mr. Reece gave a history of having sustained injury in a logging accident when a tree he cut down hit another tree that fell and landed on him. ld. at 2. An operative report documenting emergency surgery performed October 29, 2014, indicated Mr. Reece gave a history of sustaining injury when struck by a falling tree limb. (Ex. 2 at 10.)

Trauma surgeon, Dr. Peter Nowotarski, treated Mr. Reece at Erlanger. (Ex. 2.) Dr. Nowotarski performed emergency surgeries to repair a left-hip dislocation and fracture, with incarcerated bony fragments, and a fracture of the lateral tibial plateau in Mr. Reece's left knee. Id. at 10. In his consultation note, Dr. Nowotarski opined that Mr. Reece sustained his injuries when struck by a falling tree limb at work. Id. at 13-14.

Mr. Reece remained hospitalized at Erlanger for four days. (Ex. 7 at 3.) Mr. Reece testified he has received almost no treatment for his work injuries since his release from the hospital because Moffitt did not pay his medical bills. Dr. Nowotarski's records indicated he saw Mr. Reece on November 13, 2014, December 12, 2015, and May 4, 2015, for follow-up examinations. (Ex. 2 at 1.) Other than prescribing medication following the November 13 visit, Dr. Nowotarski did not actively treat Mr. Reece's injuries during the follow-up visits. (Ex. 2.)

Mr. Reece testified he has not worked anywhere since the date of injury. When he released him from the hospital, Dr. Nowotarski "put [Mr. Reece] out of work." (Ex. 2 at 1.) Following the November 13, 2014 office visit, Dr. Nowotarski required Mr. Reece to remain non-weight-bearing on his left-lower extremity. (Ex. 2 at 9.) Following the December, 12, 2014 visit, Dr. Nowotarski gave Mr. Reece a note that indicated "pt. is unable to work at this time." (Ex. 3 at 1.) Following the May 4, 2015 visit, Dr. Nowotarski gave Mr. Reece a note that "pt. is currently unable to work at his job due to his injury." ld. at 2. In his May 4, 2015 office note, Dr. Nowotarski wrote, "I do not think he will be able to go back and perform in the logging trade as he was prior to this injury." (Ex. 2 at 5.)

2 Mr. Reece testified Moffitt's owner, Jeffrey Darrell Moffitt, never came to see him at the hospital, but, for a short period after his release from the hospital, Mr. Moffitt stopped by to see him on Fridays and gave him $300 at each visit. (Ex. 1 at 4.) Mr. Moffitt stopped giving him any money after Mr. Reece retained counsel. Mr. Reese testified that, upon asking Mr. Moffitt if he would pay his medical bills, Mr. Moffitt replied that the providers could not do anything to Mr. Reece because he did not own anything. /d. Mr. Moffitt suggested Mr. Reece pay $2 to $3 per month on the bills. /d.

Mr. Reece testified he currently lives in a house without heat or air conditioning. (Ex. 1 at 5.) The owner allows him to live rent-free and pays the utilities. /d. Mr. Reece testified he receives $198 per month in food stamps.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

The employee in a workers' compensation claim has the burden of proof on all essential elements of a claim. Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Aug. 18, 2015). An employee need not prove every element of his or her claim by a preponderance of the evidence in order to obtain relief at an expedited hearing. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). At an expedited hearing, an employee has the burden to come forward with sufficient evidence from which the trial court can determine that the employee is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. /d.

Mr. Reece Sustained a Compensable Injury.

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-1 02(14) (20 15) defines a compensable injury as "an injury by accident ... arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment." Subsection (A) of the above provision states, "[a]n injury is 'accidental' only if the injury is caused by a specific incident, or set of incidents, arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment, and is identifiable by time and place of occurrence[.]"

The medical records introduced in evidence during the Expedited Hearing corroborated Mr. Reece's testimony that he sustained the claimed injuries on October 28, 2014, when struck by a falling tree while performing duties in the course and scope of his employment as a logger for Moffitt. Accordingly, the Court finds that, at a hearing on the merits, Mr. Reece will likely prevail in establishing that his back, left-hip, left-knee and left-leg injuries arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment by Moffitt.

3 Mr. Reece Is Entitled to Medical Benefits.

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-204(a)(1)(A) (2015) provides that "[t]he employer or the employer's agent shall furnish, free of charge to the employee, such medical and surgical treatment ... made reasonably necessary by accident as defmed in this chapter." The Court finds that, at a hearing on the merits, Mr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simpson v. Satterfield
564 S.W.2d 953 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 TN WC 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reece-johnny-louis-v-jeffrey-darrell-moffitt-dba-moffitt-logging-tennworkcompcl-2016.