Ree v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ree v. Goord

294 A.D.2d 735, 741 N.Y.S.2d 755, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5074

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 294 A.D.2d 735 (Ree v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ree v. Goord, 294 A.D.2d 735, 741 N.Y.S.2d 755, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5074 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits inmates from perpetrating acts of extortion or bribery. The At[736]*736torney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination was administratively reversed on February 7, 2002 and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits inmates from perpetrating acts of extortion or bribery. The At[736]*736torney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination was administratively reversed on February 7, 2002 and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 735, 741 N.Y.S.2d 755, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ree-v-goord-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack