Redwood v. Metropolitan Railroad

6 D.C. 302
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 30, 1868
DocketNo. 3451
StatusPublished

This text of 6 D.C. 302 (Redwood v. Metropolitan Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redwood v. Metropolitan Railroad, 6 D.C. 302 (D.C. 1868).

Opinion

Mr. Ciiiee Justice Cartter

delivered the opinion of the Court:

We think that the Court below erred in overruling the instruction prayed by the defendants, to the effect that the plaintiff was not entitled to vindictive or exemplary damages, but only to compensation for whatever loss, pain or injury the defendant might have sustained.

In this case it does not appear but that the defendant used all necessary diligence to secure the safety of the passengers on the road. The law will not allow exemplary damages to be inflicted on a principal for the act of his agent, unless it be shown that the principal was derelict in connection with the offense of the agent. Nothing of the kind was shown here, and a new trial must, therefore, be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 D.C. 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redwood-v-metropolitan-railroad-dc-1868.