Redwing v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Redwing v. State

202 A.D.2d 930, 610 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3067

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 930 (Redwing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redwing v. State, 202 A.D.2d 930, 610 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from that part of an order of the Court of Claims (Hanifin, J.), entered February 24, 1992, which struck certain claims for damages from the claim.

Upon its dismissal of several causes of action in the claim, the Court of Claims did not err in dismissing all damage claims other than those based on the surviving causes of action. Although claimants sought damages for litigation and related expenses, loss of earnings, and for compensation for the commission of acts constituting infliction of indignity or shame or acts resulting in the loss of liberty and civil rights, the record was devoid of any factual allegations which would allow the award of such damages. Claimants’ remaining contentions have been considered and rejected as unpersuasive.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from that part of an order of the Court of Claims (Hanifin, J.), entered February 24, 1992, which struck certain claims for damages from the claim.

Upon its dismissal of several causes of action in the claim, the Court of Claims did not err in dismissing all damage claims other than those based on the surviving causes of action. Although claimants sought damages for litigation and related expenses, loss of earnings, and for compensation for the commission of acts constituting infliction of indignity or shame or acts resulting in the loss of liberty and civil rights, the record was devoid of any factual allegations which would allow the award of such damages. Claimants’ remaining contentions have been considered and rejected as unpersuasive.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 930, 610 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redwing-v-state-nyappdiv-1994.