Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Mason

Supreme Court of Florida

Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Mason

183 So. 2d 201, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3706

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Mason. Read the opinion of the Court — 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3014 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 16, 1966·No. No. 34527·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we are requested to review an order of the Florida Public Service Commission. After having heard argument of the parties and carefully studied the record and briefs, we have determined that in entering the order under [202]*202attack the Commission did not depart from the essential requirement of the law.

The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., DREW, O’CON-NELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we are requested to review an order of the Florida Public Service Commission. After having heard argument of the parties and carefully studied the record and briefs, we have determined that in entering the order under [202]*202attack the Commission did not depart from the essential requirement of the law.

The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., DREW, O’CON-NELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge, concur.

Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Mason, 183 So. 2d 201, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3706 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

183 So. 2d 201 (Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Mason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.