Home/Supreme Court/Redwine v. Texas

Redwine v. Texas

261 U.S. 608, 43 S. Ct. 433, 67 L. Ed. 825, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2605
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 19, 1923
DocketNo. 326
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 261 U.S. 608 (Redwine v. Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redwine v. Texas, 261 U.S. 608, 43 S. Ct. 433, 67 L. Ed. 825, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2605 (1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs upon the authority of [609]*609Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 208 U. S. 481.

Mr. Joe Burkett and Mr. A. H. Corrigan for plaintiff in error. Mr: W. A. Keeling and Mr. L. C. Sutton for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Seymour
231 S.W.2d 448 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Bess v. Pearman, Superintendent
150 S.E. 54 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 U.S. 608, 43 S. Ct. 433, 67 L. Ed. 825, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redwine-v-texas-scotus-1923.