Redwine v. Texas

261 U.S. 608, 43 S. Ct. 433, 67 L. Ed. 825, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2605

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 19, 1923·No. No. 326·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs upon the authority of [609]*609Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 208 U. S. 481.

Mr. Joe Burkett and Mr. A. H. Corrigan for plaintiff in error. Mr: W. A. Keeling and Mr. L. C. Sutton for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Redwine v. Texas, 261 U.S. 608, 43 S. Ct. 433, 67 L. Ed. 825, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2605 (1923).

Pincite

261 U.S. 608 (Redwine v. Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.