Redwine v. State

189 S.W.2d 158, 189 S.W. 158, 80 Tex. Crim. 152, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 283
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Redwine v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 85 Tex. Crim. 437
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 25, 1916·No. No. 4218.·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of rape and his punishment assessed at life imprisonment. This is the second appeal in this case. The first is reported in 184 S. W. Rep., 196.

There is no statement of facts in the record. Appellant has some bills of exception, but none of them can be considered in the absence of a statement of facts. There is on file here, and which was also filed in the lower court, the stenographer’s report of the proceedings on the trial. It is in no way agreed to as correct by the attorneys, or either *153 of them, and it is in no way approved by the trial judge. It can not be considered by this court.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Redwine v. State, 189 S.W.2d 158, 189 S.W. 158, 80 Tex. Crim. 152, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 283 (Tex. 1916).

189 S.W.2d 158 (Redwine v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Redwine v. State
184 S.W. 196 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)