Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.

Supreme Court

Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.

344 U.S. 925, 73 S. Ct. 498, 97 L. Ed. 712, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2431

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 2, 1953

DocketNo. 516

StatusPublished

Cited by36 cases

This text of 344 U.S. 925 (Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co., 344 U.S. 925, 73 S. Ct. 498, 97 L. Ed. 712, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2431 (1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm [926]*926is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Wright v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co., 216 U. S. 420; Georgia R. Co. v. Redwine, 342 U. S. 299.

Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, M. H. Blackshear, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and Lamar W. Sizemore, Assistant Attorney General, for Redwine, Harold Sheats and Standish Thompson for Fulton County, and Victor Davidson and Cleburne E. Gregory, Jr. for the City of Union Point et al., appellants. Robert B. Troutman and Furman Smith for appellee. Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm [926]*926is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Wright v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co., 216 U. S. 420; Georgia R. Co. v. Redwine, 342 U. S. 299.

Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, M. H. Blackshear, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and Lamar W. Sizemore, Assistant Attorney General, for Redwine, Harold Sheats and Standish Thompson for Fulton County, and Victor Davidson and Cleburne E. Gregory, Jr. for the City of Union Point et al., appellants. Robert B. Troutman and Furman Smith for appellee. Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 U.S. 925, 73 S. Ct. 498, 97 L. Ed. 712, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redwine-v-georgia-railroad-banking-co-scotus-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack