Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.

Supreme Court

Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.

344 U.S. 925, 73 S. Ct. 498, 97 L. Ed. 712, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2431

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 2, 1953·No. No. 516·Published·Cited by 36 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm [926] is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Wright v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co., 216 U. S. 420; Georgia R. Co. v. Redwine, 342 U. S. 299.

Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, M. H. Blackshear, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and Lamar W. Sizemore, Assistant Attorney General, for Redwine, Harold Sheats and Standish Thompson for Fulton County, and Victor Davidson and Cleburne E. Gregory, Jr. for the City of Union Point et al., appellants. Robert B. Troutman and Furman Smith for appellee. Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm [926] is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Wright v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co., 216 U. S. 420; Georgia R. Co. v. Redwine, 342 U. S. 299.

Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, M. H. Blackshear, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and Lamar W. Sizemore, Assistant Attorney General, for Redwine, Harold Sheats and Standish Thompson for Fulton County, and Victor Davidson and Cleburne E. Gregory, Jr. for the City of Union Point et al., appellants. Robert B. Troutman and Furman Smith for appellee. Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co., 344 U.S. 925, 73 S. Ct. 498, 97 L. Ed. 712, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2431 (1953).

Pincite

344 U.S. 925 (Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related