Redwine v. Carr & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Redwine v. Carr & Co.

139 S.E. 1, 164 Ga. 592, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 233

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 30, 1927

DocketNos. 5729, 5731

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 139 S.E. 1 (Redwine v. Carr & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redwine v. Carr & Co., 139 S.E. 1, 164 Ga. 592, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 233 (Ga. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The petition set out a cause of action, and the court erred in sustaining the general demurrer. Kirkpatrick v. Holland, 148 Ga. 708.

2. It does not appear from the face of the petition that the plaintiff was . . guilty of such laches as that he was barred of recovery.

Judgment reversed on the main bill of exceptions, and affirmed on the cross-bill.

Injunctions, 32 C. J. p. 70, n. 47; p. 87, n. 7; p. 319, n. 31; p. 341, n. 3.

All the Justices concur. Hewlett & Dennis and E. W. Fountain, for plaintiff. Underwood & Haas and E. 8myth Gambrell, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI