Redwine v. Browne-Vintners Co., Inc.

83 S.E.2d 22, 210 Ga. 779, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 453
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 14, 1954
Docket18571
StatusPublished

This text of 83 S.E.2d 22 (Redwine v. Browne-Vintners Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redwine v. Browne-Vintners Co., Inc., 83 S.E.2d 22, 210 Ga. 779, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 453 (Ga. 1954).

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

In all material respects this case is identical with Redwine v. Schenley Industries, ante, except that no plea of estoppel is here involved; consequently the ruling in division 1 of that decision is controlling here and requires a judgment of affirmance.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Head, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.E.2d 22, 210 Ga. 779, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redwine-v-browne-vintners-co-inc-ga-1954.