Redwine v. Browne-Vintners Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Redwine v. Browne-Vintners Co., Inc.

83 S.E.2d 22, 210 Ga. 779, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 453

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1954·No. 18571·Published

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

In all material respects this case is identical with Redwine v. Schenley Industries, ante, except that no plea of estoppel is here involved; consequently the ruling in division 1 of that decision is controlling here and requires a judgment of affirmance.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Head, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

In all material respects this case is identical with Redwine v. Schenley Industries, ante, except that no plea of estoppel is here involved; consequently the ruling in division 1 of that decision is controlling here and requires a judgment of affirmance.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Head, J., who dissents.

Redwine v. Browne-Vintners Co., Inc., 83 S.E.2d 22, 210 Ga. 779, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 453 (Ga. 1954).

Pincite

83 S.E.2d 22 (Redwine v. Browne-Vintners Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.