Redus v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Redus v. State

1927 OK CR 253, 259 P. 156, 38 Okla. Crim. 78, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 257

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 27, 1927

DocketNo. A-5987.

StatusPublished

This text of 1927 OK CR 253 (Redus v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redus v. State, 1927 OK CR 253, 259 P. 156, 38 Okla. Crim. 78, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 257 (Okla. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

TER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Lincoln county on a charge of having possession of mash containing more than one-half of 1 per cent, of alcohol and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail. The case was tried in August, 1925, and appeal filed December 30, 1'925. No brief has been filed in support of the appeal.

Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court and no brief in support of the petition in error is submitted and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors and "will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment, and, if no fundamental error is apparent and the evidence is sufficient, the case will be affirmed.

We have examined the record and find that the evidence fully sustains the verdict and judgment. No jurisdictional error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Lincoln county on a charge of having possession of mash containing more than one-half of 1 per cent, of alcohol and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail. The case was tried in August, 1925, and appeal filed December 30, 1'925. No brief has been filed in support of the appeal.

Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court and no brief in support of the petition in error is submitted and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors and "will read the evidence to ascertain if it reasonably supports the judgment, and, if no fundamental error is apparent and the evidence is sufficient, the case will be affirmed.

We have examined the record and find that the evidence fully sustains the verdict and judgment. No jurisdictional error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1927 OK CR 253, 259 P. 156, 38 Okla. Crim. 78, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redus-v-state-oklacrimapp-1927.