Redstone v. State

156 So. 235, 116 Fla. 2, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1004
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 27, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 156 So. 235 (Redstone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redstone v. State, 156 So. 235, 116 Fla. 2, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1004 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only question presented in this case which appears to have any merit is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict.

The evidence might have been much stronger and more satisfactory, but we cannot say that there was not substantial evidence establishing the guilt of the accused. The jury deemed it to be so and the trial judge with all the facts and circumstances before him so ruled in passing on motion for new trial. Therefore, the judgment should be affirmed and it. is so ordered.-

Affirmed.

*3 Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment. Davis, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 So. 235, 116 Fla. 2, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redstone-v-state-fla-1934.