Redrup v. New York

Supreme Court

Redrup v. New York

384 U.S. 916, 86 S. Ct. 1362

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 25, 1966

DocketNo. 72

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 384 U.S. 916 (Redrup v. New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redrup v. New York, 384 U.S. 916, 86 S. Ct. 1362 (1966).

Pincite

Opinion

App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari granted limited to Question 4 presented by the petition which reads as follows:

“4. Whether, consistent with the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment and the constitutional standards for judging obscenity enunciated by the Supreme Court, a judgment of conviction can be rendered against an accused without proof in the record that the accused knew the contents of the material or believed that the material involved violated the law, and where books of a similar character have been held to be constitutionally protected by the courts of the State.”

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted on all the questions presented by the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

App. Term, Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari granted limited to Question 4 presented by the petition which reads as follows:

“4. Whether, consistent with the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment and the constitutional standards for judging obscenity enunciated by the Supreme Court, a judgment of conviction can be rendered against an accused without proof in the record that the accused knew the contents of the material or believed that the material involved violated the law, and where books of a similar character have been held to be constitutionally protected by the courts of the State.”

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted on all the questions presented by the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

384 U.S. 916, 86 S. Ct. 1362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redrup-v-new-york-scotus-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack