Redpath v. State

856 So. 2d 1057, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15588, 2003 WL 22462526
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 7, 2003
DocketNo. 5D03-2904
StatusPublished

This text of 856 So. 2d 1057 (Redpath v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redpath v. State, 856 So. 2d 1057, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15588, 2003 WL 22462526 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Jones v. State, 845 So.2d 55, 64-65 (Fla.2003); Mounds v. State, 849 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Graff v. State, 843 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Szymanowski v. State, 771 So.2d 10 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

SHARP, W„ GRIFFIN and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mounds v. State
849 So. 2d 1170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Graff v. State
843 So. 2d 1012 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Szymanowski v. State
771 So. 2d 10 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Jones v. State
845 So. 2d 55 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
856 So. 2d 1057, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15588, 2003 WL 22462526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redpath-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.