Redoutey v. Dean

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Redoutey v. Dean

867 So. 2d 638, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3080, 2004 WL 442896

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 2004

DocketNo. 5D03-2175

StatusPublished

This text of 867 So. 2d 638 (Redoutey v. Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redoutey v. Dean, 867 So. 2d 638, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3080, 2004 WL 442896 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Redoutey appeals the denial by the trial court of his petition for writ of mandamus. We affirm the denial in all respects, save one. Because it appears that Mr. Redoutey falls within the definition of a “working prisoner,” he is entitled to a credit of thirty cents per day “on account of fines and costs adjudged against him or her.” See § 951.15, Fla. Stat. (2003). Thus we reverse in part, and remand to the trial court with instructions to grant the writ of mandamus with respect to the per diem charge.

[639]*639AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and remanded with instructions.

PETERSON, THOMPSON, and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Redoutey appeals the denial by the trial court of his petition for writ of mandamus. We affirm the denial in all respects, save one. Because it appears that Mr. Redoutey falls within the definition of a “working prisoner,” he is entitled to a credit of thirty cents per day “on account of fines and costs adjudged against him or her.” See § 951.15, Fla. Stat. (2003). Thus we reverse in part, and remand to the trial court with instructions to grant the writ of mandamus with respect to the per diem charge.

[639]*639AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and remanded with instructions.

PETERSON, THOMPSON, and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

867 So. 2d 638, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3080, 2004 WL 442896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redoutey-v-dean-fladistctapp-2004.