Redmond v. Staten Island Hospital

10 A.D.2d 629, 196 N.Y.S.2d 201, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11954
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict, in favor of respondents. Respondent Mary W. Redmond was injured when she fell from an entrance platform into a gully which was directly in front of, and about two feet below, the platform. Judgment unani[630]*630mously affirmed, with costs. There was sufficient credible evidence to raise a question of fact for the jury. In our opinion the error, if any, in a hypothetical question put to respondents’ architect and the error, if any, in the charge to the jury, did not affect or prejudice any substantial right of the appellant; therefore such errors must be disregarded (Civ. Prac. Act, § 106). Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Redmond v. Staten Island Hospital, 10 A.D.2d 629, 196 N.Y.S.2d 201, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

10 A.D.2d 629 (Redmond v. Staten Island Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cerro v. Northfield Enterprises, Inc.
278 A.D.2d 190 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)