Redmond v. State

358 S.W.3d 564, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 149, 2012 WL 424857
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 7, 2012
DocketED 96638
StatusPublished

This text of 358 S.W.3d 564 (Redmond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redmond v. State, 358 S.W.3d 564, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 149, 2012 WL 424857 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Collins Redmond appeals from the motion court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order (judgment) denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for an Evidentiary Hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Atterberry
358 S.W.3d 564 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 S.W.3d 564, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 149, 2012 WL 424857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redmond-v-state-moctapp-2012.