Redmond v. Redmond
248 S.E.2d 656, 242 Ga. 250, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1162
Opinion
In a contempt action for denial of visitation rights, the trial court, upon motion of the defendant, modified the visitation rights. We affirm. Modification of visitation rights in a contempt action is authorized. We decline to overrrule Sampson v. Sampson, 240 Ga. 118 (239 SE2d 519) (1977). Findings of fact and conclusions of law are not required in an order on a motion to change visitation rights. Hines v. Hines, 237 Ga. 755 (229 SE2d 744) (1976). The evidence supports the order.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Redmond v. Redmond, 248 S.E.2d 656, 242 Ga. 250, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1162 (Ga. 1978).
248 S.E.2d 656 (Redmond v. Redmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hines v. Hines
229 S.E.2d 744 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Sampson v. Sampson
239 S.E.2d 519 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)