Redmond v. Redmond

248 S.E.2d 656, 242 Ga. 250, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1162
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 27, 1978
Docket33925
StatusPublished

This text of 248 S.E.2d 656 (Redmond v. Redmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redmond v. Redmond, 248 S.E.2d 656, 242 Ga. 250, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1162 (Ga. 1978).

Opinion

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

In a contempt action for denial of visitation rights, the trial court, upon motion of the defendant, modified the visitation rights. We affirm. Modification of visitation rights in a contempt action is authorized. We decline to overrrule Sampson v. Sampson, 240 Ga. 118 (239 SE2d 519) (1977). Findings of fact and conclusions of law are not required in an order on a motion to change visitation rights. Hines v. Hines, 237 Ga. 755 (229 SE2d 744) (1976). The evidence supports the order.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hines v. Hines
229 S.E.2d 744 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Sampson v. Sampson
239 S.E.2d 519 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 S.E.2d 656, 242 Ga. 250, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redmond-v-redmond-ga-1978.