Redmond v. City of Detroit
724 N.W.2d 467, 477 Mich. 967
This text of 724 N.W.2d 467 (Redmond v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Redmond v. City of Detroit, 724 N.W.2d 467, 477 Mich. 967 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Dare REDMOND, Personal Representative of the Estate of Derrick Kelly, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant, and
Lou Gianino, Jayme Travis, Jennifer G. Navalta, and Scott Stanisky, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hardy v. MGM GRAND DETROIT, LLC
724 N.W.2d 467 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
724 N.W.2d 467, 477 Mich. 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redmond-v-city-of-detroit-mich-2006.