Redmond v. Broderick

243 A.D. 579

This text of 243 A.D. 579 (Redmond v. Broderick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Redmond v. Broderick, 243 A.D. 579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Order granting plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and denying motion of the appealing defendants for summary judgment, and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs entered thereon, in an action to recover taxes paid on property which the defendants were obligated to pay, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The second mortgagee was expressly obligated to pay these taxes as a consequence of its engagements with the owner of the fee and the mortgagor, in the event it entered into possession of the premises and collected rents thereof. The plaintiffs, in order to prevent a forfeiture, paid these taxes which the second mortgagee was thus obligated to pay, which forfeiture was threatened by the owner of the fee. In so doing the plaintiffs, on behalf of the first mortgagee, became subrogated to the rights of the owner of the fee as against the second mortgagee. Present — Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redmond-v-broderick-nyappdiv-1934.