Redmon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Redmon v. State

112 S.W.2d 719, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 889

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 19, 1938

DocketNo. 19323

StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.W.2d 719 (Redmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redmon v. State, 112 S.W.2d 719, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 889 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is burglary. ’Mdictr embraced averments to the effect that ap*-pellant had, prior to the alleged commission of the present offense, been twice convicted of felonies less than capital. Because of repetition of offenses, the penalty was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

No error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is burglary. ’Mdictr embraced averments to the effect that ap*-pellant had, prior to the alleged commission of the present offense, been twice convicted of felonies less than capital. Because of repetition of offenses, the penalty was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

No error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 S.W.2d 719, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redmon-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.