Redmon v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Redmon v. State

660 S.W.2d 940, 281 Ark. 67, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1575

DecidedDecember 5, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 660 S.W.2d 940 (Redmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Redmon v. State, 660 S.W.2d 940, 281 Ark. 67, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1575 (Ark. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Daniel Redmon, by his attorneys, Wayne A. Gruber and Jim F. Akins, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and it was no fault of the appellant. His attorneys admit that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on their part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorneys for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Daniel Redmon, by his attorneys, Wayne A. Gruber and Jim F. Akins, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and it was no fault of the appellant. His attorneys admit that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on their part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorneys for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

660 S.W.2d 940, 281 Ark. 67, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/redmon-v-state-ark-1983.